https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119773 The Tribunal denied the appellant the benefit of the SSI Exemption due to the use of registered brand names. Allegations of clandestine removal of goods lacked evidence and were set aside. The valuation under Section 4A was not justified based solely on revised stickers, leading to the revision being set aside. The confiscation of goods due to non-entry in the RG 1 Register was upheld, along with penalties. The impugned order was modified accordingly, and the matter was remanded for reevaluation of duty and penalties. en-us Mon, 26 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Jul 2012 10:57:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119773 The Tribunal denied the appellant the benefit of the SSI Exemption due to the use of registered brand names. Allegations of clandestine removal of goods lacked evidence and were set aside. The valuation under Section 4A was not justified based solely on revised stickers, leading to the revision being set aside. The confiscation of goods due to non-entry in the RG 1 Register was upheld, along with penalties. The impugned order was modified accordingly, and the matter was remanded for reevaluation of duty and penalties. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 26 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119773