https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119762 The Hon'ble High Court allowed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, emphasizing the Tribunal's failure to consider the advocate's affidavit in a condonation of delay application. The advocate's affidavit detailed reasons for the delay, but the Tribunal found the appellant's choice of an advocate not specialized in Central Excise Law careless. The Tribunal dismissed the condonation application, stay application, and appeal due to the appellant's failure to justify the delay adequately and engage a proficient advocate. The decision highlights the importance of providing valid reasons for delays and engaging specialized legal professionals. en-us Wed, 14 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Jul 2012 10:20:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119762 The Hon'ble High Court allowed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, emphasizing the Tribunal's failure to consider the advocate's affidavit in a condonation of delay application. The advocate's affidavit detailed reasons for the delay, but the Tribunal found the appellant's choice of an advocate not specialized in Central Excise Law careless. The Tribunal dismissed the condonation application, stay application, and appeal due to the appellant's failure to justify the delay adequately and engage a proficient advocate. The decision highlights the importance of providing valid reasons for delays and engaging specialized legal professionals. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 14 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119762