<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (6) TMI 363 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119743</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals against the order-in-original for confiscation of seized goods and trucks, as well as penalties imposed on the appellants. It found the confiscation of sugar unjustified, upheld the confiscation of trucks but reduced the redemption fine, and set aside the penalties due to lack of evidence implicating the appellants in smuggling activities. The impugned order was modified accordingly, granting the appeals with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 18:12:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (6) TMI 363 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119743</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals against the order-in-original for confiscation of seized goods and trucks, as well as penalties imposed on the appellants. It found the confiscation of sugar unjustified, upheld the confiscation of trucks but reduced the redemption fine, and set aside the penalties due to lack of evidence implicating the appellants in smuggling activities. The impugned order was modified accordingly, granting the appeals with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119743</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>