<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (6) TMI 361 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119741</link>
    <description>The Commissioner upheld the Assessee&#039;s entitlement to a refund under the Limitation Act, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The Commissioner emphasized that the reliance on a previous judgment was correct, noting no material change in the definition of manufacture. The Tribunal overturned the lower authority&#039;s decision, emphasizing that individuals must independently establish their legal positions and cannot seek refunds based on judgments in unrelated cases. The importance of fighting individual legal battles was underscored, leading to the ruling in favor of the Revenue and the inadmissibility of refund claims based on decisions in unrelated cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 18:10:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156737" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (6) TMI 361 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119741</link>
      <description>The Commissioner upheld the Assessee&#039;s entitlement to a refund under the Limitation Act, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The Commissioner emphasized that the reliance on a previous judgment was correct, noting no material change in the definition of manufacture. The Tribunal overturned the lower authority&#039;s decision, emphasizing that individuals must independently establish their legal positions and cannot seek refunds based on judgments in unrelated cases. The importance of fighting individual legal battles was underscored, leading to the ruling in favor of the Revenue and the inadmissibility of refund claims based on decisions in unrelated cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119741</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>