<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (12) TMI 255 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119726</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s claim of co-ownership and distribution of rental income for the property at 24, G.B. Marg, Lucknow. The issue of vacancy allowance for the property at 11, Station Road, Lucknow was restored to the Assessing Officer for verification. The Tribunal upheld the validity of proceedings under section 148 for the assessment years 1997-98 and 1999-2000, allowing reassessment based on findings from the year 2002-03.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 17:28:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156722" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (12) TMI 255 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119726</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s claim of co-ownership and distribution of rental income for the property at 24, G.B. Marg, Lucknow. The issue of vacancy allowance for the property at 11, Station Road, Lucknow was restored to the Assessing Officer for verification. The Tribunal upheld the validity of proceedings under section 148 for the assessment years 1997-98 and 1999-2000, allowing reassessment based on findings from the year 2002-03.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119726</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>