https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119719 The statutory scheme under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act treats the Central Food Laboratory as the final authority in disputed food-sample cases. Where the Port Health Officer certifies imported edible goods as fit for human consumption and the Central Food Laboratory confirms conformity with the prescribed standard, contrary reports from the Customs Chemical Examiner and CRCL cannot override that statutory opinion. On that footing, the allegation of misdeclaration fails, and the imported RBD Palmolein is not liable to confiscation or penalty. en-us Wed, 31 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Jul 2012 16:57:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119719 The statutory scheme under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act treats the Central Food Laboratory as the final authority in disputed food-sample cases. Where the Port Health Officer certifies imported edible goods as fit for human consumption and the Central Food Laboratory confirms conformity with the prescribed standard, contrary reports from the Customs Chemical Examiner and CRCL cannot override that statutory opinion. On that footing, the allegation of misdeclaration fails, and the imported RBD Palmolein is not liable to confiscation or penalty. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 31 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119719