<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 296 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119700</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the assessment orders were not erroneous. The Commissioner&#039;s invocation of section 263 of the Income-tax Act was set aside, and the appeals by the assessees were allowed. The Tribunal found that the AO&#039;s decisions on jurisdiction, classification of income from leave and licence agreements, and computation of profit on the sale of built-up area were consistent with judicial precedents and not erroneous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 15:59:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156696" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 296 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119700</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the assessment orders were not erroneous. The Commissioner&#039;s invocation of section 263 of the Income-tax Act was set aside, and the appeals by the assessees were allowed. The Tribunal found that the AO&#039;s decisions on jurisdiction, classification of income from leave and licence agreements, and computation of profit on the sale of built-up area were consistent with judicial precedents and not erroneous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>