<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 389 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119698</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of part of the refund claims as time-barred under the Customs Act due to the failure to file within the statutory limitation period. The Tribunal rejected the argument that the limitation period should not apply as the cess payments were made under protest, emphasizing that protesting against the levy of cess does not constitute the protest contemplated in the Customs Act. However, the Tribunal allowed the appeals for the claim of interest on delayed refunds, directing the lower authorities to grant interest in accordance with Section 27.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 15:58:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156694" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 389 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119698</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of part of the refund claims as time-barred under the Customs Act due to the failure to file within the statutory limitation period. The Tribunal rejected the argument that the limitation period should not apply as the cess payments were made under protest, emphasizing that protesting against the levy of cess does not constitute the protest contemplated in the Customs Act. However, the Tribunal allowed the appeals for the claim of interest on delayed refunds, directing the lower authorities to grant interest in accordance with Section 27.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119698</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>