<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 293 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119692</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal of the banking company, overturning the disallowance of expenses for audit fee paid for US GAAP work. The Tribunal held that the expenditure was incurred for commercial expediency and in furtherance of business operations, aligning with reporting obligations to the foreign banking company&#039;s head office. The genuineness of the expenditure was not in question, and it was deemed allowable under sections 36 and 37 of the Income-tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 15:42:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 293 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119692</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal of the banking company, overturning the disallowance of expenses for audit fee paid for US GAAP work. The Tribunal held that the expenditure was incurred for commercial expediency and in furtherance of business operations, aligning with reporting obligations to the foreign banking company&#039;s head office. The genuineness of the expenditure was not in question, and it was deemed allowable under sections 36 and 37 of the Income-tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119692</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>