<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 385 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119691</link>
    <description>Colour picture tubes returned by television manufacturers for repair are not to be treated as clandestinely manufactured goods where D-3 declarations, repair registers, sender invoices under Rule 57F(3), and despatch invoices contemporaneously support receipt and repair under Rule 173H. Serial number-wise correlation cannot reasonably be required where serial numbers were not recorded at the original clearance stage. In the absence of contrary evidence, such documentary records establish the repair character of the goods and do not support central excise duty, confiscation, or a clandestine manufacture allegation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 15:45:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156687" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 385 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119691</link>
      <description>Colour picture tubes returned by television manufacturers for repair are not to be treated as clandestinely manufactured goods where D-3 declarations, repair registers, sender invoices under Rule 57F(3), and despatch invoices contemporaneously support receipt and repair under Rule 173H. Serial number-wise correlation cannot reasonably be required where serial numbers were not recorded at the original clearance stage. In the absence of contrary evidence, such documentary records establish the repair character of the goods and do not support central excise duty, confiscation, or a clandestine manufacture allegation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119691</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>