<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 377 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119680</link>
    <description>Imported furnace oil intended for use in the manufacture of fertilizers was held to fall prima facie within the scope of Notification No. 16/2000-Cus., supporting exemption on a broader construction of the entry. The record also indicated that part of the shortage arose from theft in transit, and remission of duty on that quantity ought to have been considered because theft was treated as an accident for remission purposes under the relevant excise rule. These factors together established a prima facie case against the duty demand and penalty, justifying waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 15:08:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156676" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 377 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119680</link>
      <description>Imported furnace oil intended for use in the manufacture of fertilizers was held to fall prima facie within the scope of Notification No. 16/2000-Cus., supporting exemption on a broader construction of the entry. The record also indicated that part of the shortage arose from theft in transit, and remission of duty on that quantity ought to have been considered because theft was treated as an accident for remission purposes under the relevant excise rule. These factors together established a prima facie case against the duty demand and penalty, justifying waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119680</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>