<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 370 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119670</link>
    <description>Duty demand was found unsustainable where the goods were proved to have been exported through Nepal Customs certificates, certified shipping bills and ARE-1 documents matching quantity and batch numbers. Although the exporter followed the wrong notification procedure, the record established actual export, so the duty demand was set aside. The penalty was, however, sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:39:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156666" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 370 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119670</link>
      <description>Duty demand was found unsustainable where the goods were proved to have been exported through Nepal Customs certificates, certified shipping bills and ARE-1 documents matching quantity and batch numbers. Although the exporter followed the wrong notification procedure, the record established actual export, so the duty demand was set aside. The penalty was, however, sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>