<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 366 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119660</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Order-in-Original, dismissing the appeal and affirming the penalty imposed on the appellants for the short landing of goods under Section 116 of the Customs Act. The judgment was based on discrepancies in weight records, concluding short landing without requiring mens rea for imposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:00:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156656" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 366 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119660</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Order-in-Original, dismissing the appeal and affirming the penalty imposed on the appellants for the short landing of goods under Section 116 of the Customs Act. The judgment was based on discrepancies in weight records, concluding short landing without requiring mens rea for imposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119660</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>