<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 365 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119659</link>
    <description>Credit was treated as admissible on polyester resins used to fabricate tubes, pipes and tanks, because those items were required for the plant used in manufacturing the final products. Explanation 2 inserted by Notification No. 6/2001 was read as permitting credit on goods used in the manufacture of capital goods that are further used in the manufacturer&#039;s factory. On that construction, the appellate order granting credit was found to be legally correct, and the Revenue&#039;s objection to such credit failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 13:58:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156655" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 365 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119659</link>
      <description>Credit was treated as admissible on polyester resins used to fabricate tubes, pipes and tanks, because those items were required for the plant used in manufacturing the final products. Explanation 2 inserted by Notification No. 6/2001 was read as permitting credit on goods used in the manufacture of capital goods that are further used in the manufacturer&#039;s factory. On that construction, the appellate order granting credit was found to be legally correct, and the Revenue&#039;s objection to such credit failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119659</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>