<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 362 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119656</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in a case involving the re-import of goods by a 100% E.O.U. beyond one year from the date of export. Despite the Revenue&#039;s demand for duty due to non-fulfillment of conditions, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants. It highlighted the sympathetic approach of Board&#039;s Circular No. 60/99 Cus., which did not specify a time limit for re-import in cases of defective goods. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of permissions obtained and concluded that the Circular&#039;s provisions justified the appellants&#039; claim for exemption from duty, considering the delay in re-import as a technical lapse.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 13:53:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156652" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 362 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119656</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in a case involving the re-import of goods by a 100% E.O.U. beyond one year from the date of export. Despite the Revenue&#039;s demand for duty due to non-fulfillment of conditions, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants. It highlighted the sympathetic approach of Board&#039;s Circular No. 60/99 Cus., which did not specify a time limit for re-import in cases of defective goods. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of permissions obtained and concluded that the Circular&#039;s provisions justified the appellants&#039; claim for exemption from duty, considering the delay in re-import as a technical lapse.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119656</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>