<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 280 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119642</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, quashing the orders due to limitations and following precedents set by previous Tribunal decisions. The Tribunal held that if notices were issued beyond four years, the Assessing Officer&#039;s order was void ab initio, and proceedings initiated beyond the time limit were barred by limitations. The Tribunal found in favor of the assessee, allowing all appeals on merit based on previous Tribunal decisions and the Apex Court&#039;s findings, ultimately leading to the cancellation of all orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 13:20:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156638" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 280 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119642</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, quashing the orders due to limitations and following precedents set by previous Tribunal decisions. The Tribunal held that if notices were issued beyond four years, the Assessing Officer&#039;s order was void ab initio, and proceedings initiated beyond the time limit were barred by limitations. The Tribunal found in favor of the assessee, allowing all appeals on merit based on previous Tribunal decisions and the Apex Court&#039;s findings, ultimately leading to the cancellation of all orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119642</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>