https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119633 The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the original adjudicating authority for a fresh decision. The appellants successfully challenged the duty liability determination based on the inclusion of galleries in the Annual Production Capacity calculation. The timing of show cause notices in relation to the final order, along with legal precedents and challenges raised by the appellants, led to the decision to remand the matter for reconsideration. en-us Thu, 27 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Jul 2012 12:48:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119633 The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the original adjudicating authority for a fresh decision. The appellants successfully challenged the duty liability determination based on the inclusion of galleries in the Annual Production Capacity calculation. The timing of show cause notices in relation to the final order, along with legal precedents and challenges raised by the appellants, led to the decision to remand the matter for reconsideration. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 27 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119633