<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 417 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119612</link>
    <description>Rule 5 of the Hot Re-rolling Steel Mills Annual Capacity Determination Rules, 1997 applies only where the capacity fixed under the formula is lower than the mill&#039;s actual 1996-97 production, in which case the actual production figure substitutes the determined capacity. Where a change in pinion distance in April 1997 altered production capacity, the 1996-97 figures were not comparable for later years, and the rule did not permit a pro rata or notional reconstruction of production to support a higher duty demand. The text states that the capacity remained 3613 MT, duty had already been paid on that basis, and the demand based on 1996-97 actual production was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 11:48:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 417 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119612</link>
      <description>Rule 5 of the Hot Re-rolling Steel Mills Annual Capacity Determination Rules, 1997 applies only where the capacity fixed under the formula is lower than the mill&#039;s actual 1996-97 production, in which case the actual production figure substitutes the determined capacity. Where a change in pinion distance in April 1997 altered production capacity, the 1996-97 figures were not comparable for later years, and the rule did not permit a pro rata or notional reconstruction of production to support a higher duty demand. The text states that the capacity remained 3613 MT, duty had already been paid on that basis, and the demand based on 1996-97 actual production was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119612</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>