<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 353 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119605</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the decisions of the CIT (Appeals) and the Assessing Officer, directing a fresh examination by the Assessing Officer on all issues concerning taxable interest on stock options, treatment of income from the sale of shares, deduction claims under sections 54F and 54EA, and the admissibility of fresh evidence. The Tribunal emphasized compliance with legal provisions and procedural fairness, allowing both appeals for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 11:28:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 353 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119605</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the decisions of the CIT (Appeals) and the Assessing Officer, directing a fresh examination by the Assessing Officer on all issues concerning taxable interest on stock options, treatment of income from the sale of shares, deduction claims under sections 54F and 54EA, and the admissibility of fresh evidence. The Tribunal emphasized compliance with legal provisions and procedural fairness, allowing both appeals for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>