<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 352 - ITAT JABALPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119604</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the reassessment proceedings were invalid as the assessee&#039;s business as a builder did not fall under section 44AD, and there was no need for an audit report under section 44AB. The application of an 8% profit estimation on gross receipts was deemed unjustified as the assessee maintained proper books of account. Therefore, the appeal was allowed, and the reassessment under section 147 with section 143(3) was annulled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 11:21:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156600" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 352 - ITAT JABALPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119604</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the reassessment proceedings were invalid as the assessee&#039;s business as a builder did not fall under section 44AD, and there was no need for an audit report under section 44AB. The application of an 8% profit estimation on gross receipts was deemed unjustified as the assessee maintained proper books of account. Therefore, the appeal was allowed, and the reassessment under section 147 with section 143(3) was annulled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119604</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>