<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 349 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119598</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on all issues for statistical purposes. It remanded the depreciation issue back to the AO for fresh adjudication. The Tribunal accepted the assessee&#039;s claims for bad debts, affirming that the write-off in the books is prima facie evidence of the debt becoming bad, thus rejecting the CIT(A)&#039;s findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2024 16:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156595" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 349 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119598</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on all issues for statistical purposes. It remanded the depreciation issue back to the AO for fresh adjudication. The Tribunal accepted the assessee&#039;s claims for bad debts, affirming that the write-off in the books is prima facie evidence of the debt becoming bad, thus rejecting the CIT(A)&#039;s findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119598</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>