<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 410 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119595</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the confiscation of the truck due to the recovery of goods of foreign origin, emphasizing the owner&#039;s responsibility to prove lack of knowledge or consent regarding the use of the vehicle in transporting smuggled goods. The failure to produce the driver as evidence led to the dismissal of the appeal challenging the confiscation of the truck.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 10:59:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156592" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 410 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119595</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the confiscation of the truck due to the recovery of goods of foreign origin, emphasizing the owner&#039;s responsibility to prove lack of knowledge or consent regarding the use of the vehicle in transporting smuggled goods. The failure to produce the driver as evidence led to the dismissal of the appeal challenging the confiscation of the truck.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119595</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>