<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 408 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119592</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the lower appellate authority&#039;s decision to accept the transaction value without considering the impact of misdeclaration on the value of imported goods. It upheld the penalty due to lack of challenge by the assessee but found the decision to vacate the redemption fine for want of margin of profit unsustainable. The tribunal remanded the case for reexamination, focusing on the valuation issue and redemption fine, ensuring the party&#039;s right to be heard. Confiscation and penalty were maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 10:51:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156589" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 408 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119592</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the lower appellate authority&#039;s decision to accept the transaction value without considering the impact of misdeclaration on the value of imported goods. It upheld the penalty due to lack of challenge by the assessee but found the decision to vacate the redemption fine for want of margin of profit unsustainable. The tribunal remanded the case for reexamination, focusing on the valuation issue and redemption fine, ensuring the party&#039;s right to be heard. Confiscation and penalty were maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119592</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>