https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119590 The Tribunal set aside the adjudication order due to discrepancies in the declared value of exported goods, confiscation, redemption fine, and reduced DEPB benefit. It found faults in the market enquiry procedure and lack of proper evidence presentation. The case was remanded for fresh adjudication, allowing both parties to submit additional evidence. The Tribunal stressed the importance of a proper market enquiry process and directed a fair reconsideration of the valuation and penalties, ensuring a thorough review. en-us Wed, 12 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Jul 2012 10:42:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119590 The Tribunal set aside the adjudication order due to discrepancies in the declared value of exported goods, confiscation, redemption fine, and reduced DEPB benefit. It found faults in the market enquiry procedure and lack of proper evidence presentation. The case was remanded for fresh adjudication, allowing both parties to submit additional evidence. The Tribunal stressed the importance of a proper market enquiry process and directed a fair reconsideration of the valuation and penalties, ensuring a thorough review. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 12 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119590