<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 398 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119577</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with the confiscation of DG sets and the associated penalty being set aside. The denial of Modvat credit on alternators was upheld. The court found no indication of clandestine removal of the DG sets and supported the appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the lack of justification for confiscation and penalty. However, the denial of Modvat credit was maintained due to the absence of modvatable items during verification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 18:37:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156574" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 398 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119577</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with the confiscation of DG sets and the associated penalty being set aside. The denial of Modvat credit on alternators was upheld. The court found no indication of clandestine removal of the DG sets and supported the appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the lack of justification for confiscation and penalty. However, the denial of Modvat credit was maintained due to the absence of modvatable items during verification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119577</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>