<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 397 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119576</link>
    <description>Amounts recovered under Rule 57CC of the Central Excise Rules were treated as distinct from duty, so the conditions for invoking penalty and interest under Sections 11AC and 11AB of the Central Excise Act were not met. Because those provisions apply only where duty has not been paid, has not been levied, or has been short-paid or short-levied, they could not be sustained against the Rule 57CC amount payable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 18:27:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156573" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 397 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119576</link>
      <description>Amounts recovered under Rule 57CC of the Central Excise Rules were treated as distinct from duty, so the conditions for invoking penalty and interest under Sections 11AC and 11AB of the Central Excise Act were not met. Because those provisions apply only where duty has not been paid, has not been levied, or has been short-paid or short-levied, they could not be sustained against the Rule 57CC amount payable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119576</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>