https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119555 The Tribunal dismissed the Department's appeal and resolved the Cross Objection filed by the Respondent, upholding the order-in-appeal. It was found that the appellant's availing of Modvat credit on capital goods without filing a declaration for exempted products was in compliance with the legal framework. The Tribunal emphasized the timeline of events surrounding the installation of the capital goods and the imposition of the tax levy on the appellant's final product, "Packaged Tea," leading to the rejection of the Department's appeal. en-us Mon, 03 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Jul 2012 17:30:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119555 The Tribunal dismissed the Department's appeal and resolved the Cross Objection filed by the Respondent, upholding the order-in-appeal. It was found that the appellant's availing of Modvat credit on capital goods without filing a declaration for exempted products was in compliance with the legal framework. The Tribunal emphasized the timeline of events surrounding the installation of the capital goods and the imposition of the tax levy on the appellant's final product, "Packaged Tea," leading to the rejection of the Department's appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 03 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119555