https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119554 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants regarding the demand of duty on Light Diesel Oil (LDO) mixed with Furnace Oil (FO) and the penalty imposed for the period between June 2003 and January 2004. The Tribunal found that the duty imposition was not valid as the operations occurred solely within the warehouse, and Rule 8 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 did not authorize duty levy on goods handled within the warehouse. Consequently, the appellants were granted waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery for the duty and penalty amounts. en-us Fri, 31 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Jul 2012 17:28:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119554 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants regarding the demand of duty on Light Diesel Oil (LDO) mixed with Furnace Oil (FO) and the penalty imposed for the period between June 2003 and January 2004. The Tribunal found that the duty imposition was not valid as the operations occurred solely within the warehouse, and Rule 8 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 did not authorize duty levy on goods handled within the warehouse. Consequently, the appellants were granted waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery for the duty and penalty amounts. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 31 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119554