https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119545 The Tribunal held that Customs authorities lacked jurisdiction to deny DEPB credit post-debonding. Emphasizing DGFT's exclusive authority in determining DEPB benefit eligibility, the Tribunal set aside Customs' decision and highlighted the need to adhere to DGFT directives on DEPB benefits. The judgment underscored the delineation of authority between Customs and DGFT, affirming the appellants' entitlement to DEPB benefit on goods exported after debonding from the EOU scheme. en-us Wed, 29 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Jul 2012 17:05:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119545 The Tribunal held that Customs authorities lacked jurisdiction to deny DEPB credit post-debonding. Emphasizing DGFT's exclusive authority in determining DEPB benefit eligibility, the Tribunal set aside Customs' decision and highlighted the need to adhere to DGFT directives on DEPB benefits. The judgment underscored the delineation of authority between Customs and DGFT, affirming the appellants' entitlement to DEPB benefit on goods exported after debonding from the EOU scheme. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 29 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119545