<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 411 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119540</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee regarding the change in the method of valuation of closing stock. It held that the change was made to comply with statutory requirements and was not mala fide. The Tribunal clarified that the valuation of opening stock does not necessarily have to match the closing stock valuation when there is a bona fide change in the method of valuation of closing stock.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 16:48:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156537" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 411 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119540</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee regarding the change in the method of valuation of closing stock. It held that the change was made to comply with statutory requirements and was not mala fide. The Tribunal clarified that the valuation of opening stock does not necessarily have to match the closing stock valuation when there is a bona fide change in the method of valuation of closing stock.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119540</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>