<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 646 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119525</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed due to the small amount of duty involved. The appellants argued that the issue was about the value of metal castings, making the amount irrelevant. The Tribunal agreed and restored the appeal for final disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 16:02:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156522" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 646 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119525</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed due to the small amount of duty involved. The appellants argued that the issue was about the value of metal castings, making the amount irrelevant. The Tribunal agreed and restored the appeal for final disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>