<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 641 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119517</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order, ruling that the statutory time limit under Section 11B of the CE Act applies to refund claims for amounts paid in excess of duty. Refund applications must be filed within this prescribed limitation period, even for payments made without legal authority. The Tribunal did not address the issue of adjusting excess duty against other payable duties, focusing solely on the limitation period&#039;s applicability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2024 17:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156514" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 641 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119517</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order, ruling that the statutory time limit under Section 11B of the CE Act applies to refund claims for amounts paid in excess of duty. Refund applications must be filed within this prescribed limitation period, even for payments made without legal authority. The Tribunal did not address the issue of adjusting excess duty against other payable duties, focusing solely on the limitation period&#039;s applicability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>