https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119516 The appeal was allowed, setting aside the impugned order and providing consequential relief to the appellant. The court concluded that the drained molasses were unfit for human consumption and not subject to duty, as supervised by State Excise authorities. The demand for duty on the drained molasses was deemed unjustified, and no justification existed for confirming duty on the alleged quantity. The judgment was pronounced on 17-3-2006. en-us Fri, 17 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Jul 2012 15:32:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119516 The appeal was allowed, setting aside the impugned order and providing consequential relief to the appellant. The court concluded that the drained molasses were unfit for human consumption and not subject to duty, as supervised by State Excise authorities. The demand for duty on the drained molasses was deemed unjustified, and no justification existed for confirming duty on the alleged quantity. The judgment was pronounced on 17-3-2006. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 17 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119516