https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119515 Interim stay of an impugned excise order was granted without insisting on pre-deposit, because the omission of Section 3A of the Central Excise Act was treated as relevant to the application. The text notes that Section 38A, inserted by the Finance Act, 2001, was also considered in relation to the omitted provision. On that basis, the stay application was disposed of by granting interim protection without any pre-deposit requirement. en-us Fri, 17 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Jul 2012 15:28:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119515 Interim stay of an impugned excise order was granted without insisting on pre-deposit, because the omission of Section 3A of the Central Excise Act was treated as relevant to the application. The text notes that Section 38A, inserted by the Finance Act, 2001, was also considered in relation to the omitted provision. On that basis, the stay application was disposed of by granting interim protection without any pre-deposit requirement. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 17 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119515