<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 618 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119480</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the appellate order that set aside the refund claim of excess duty paid on imported tools. The decision was based on the doctrine of unjust enrichment and the requirement for the appellant to demonstrate non-passing on of duty to be eligible for a refund. The tribunal found the certificates from Chartered Accountants insufficient as they did not address the accounting treatment of the duty paid, leading to the presumption that the duty amount was included in pricing and passed on indirectly to purchasers. The judgment emphasized the importance of accounting treatment in determining passing on of duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 13:13:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156477" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 618 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119480</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the appellate order that set aside the refund claim of excess duty paid on imported tools. The decision was based on the doctrine of unjust enrichment and the requirement for the appellant to demonstrate non-passing on of duty to be eligible for a refund. The tribunal found the certificates from Chartered Accountants insufficient as they did not address the accounting treatment of the duty paid, leading to the presumption that the duty amount was included in pricing and passed on indirectly to purchasers. The judgment emphasized the importance of accounting treatment in determining passing on of duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119480</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>