https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119475 The Tribunal refused to condone the delay of about 57 days in filing the appeal, citing lack of compelling grounds for the delay. Despite explanations provided, including the closure of the factory and difficulties in realizing the order's importance, the Tribunal emphasized the need for justifying each day of delay beyond the limitation period. The appellants' casual attitude in not promptly challenging the order was considered significant. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed on the grounds of limitation, highlighting the importance of adhering to statutory timelines and demonstrating valid reasons for delays in legal proceedings. en-us Tue, 07 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Jul 2012 12:58:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119475 The Tribunal refused to condone the delay of about 57 days in filing the appeal, citing lack of compelling grounds for the delay. Despite explanations provided, including the closure of the factory and difficulties in realizing the order's importance, the Tribunal emphasized the need for justifying each day of delay beyond the limitation period. The appellants' casual attitude in not promptly challenging the order was considered significant. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed on the grounds of limitation, highlighting the importance of adhering to statutory timelines and demonstrating valid reasons for delays in legal proceedings. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 07 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119475