<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 607 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119465</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai confirmed duty against the appellants for manufacturing a computer network from basic components. However, a Board&#039;s Circular clarified that creating a computer network from duty paid computers does not amount to manufacture if it does not result in new goods. The stay petition was unconditionally allowed based on this clarification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 12:38:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156462" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 607 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119465</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai confirmed duty against the appellants for manufacturing a computer network from basic components. However, a Board&#039;s Circular clarified that creating a computer network from duty paid computers does not amount to manufacture if it does not result in new goods. The stay petition was unconditionally allowed based on this clarification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119465</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>