<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 606 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119464</link>
    <description>Export clearances are not to be included in the aggregate value of clearances for SSI exemption, as only clearances for home consumption are counted under the relevant notifications. The Tribunal relied on its earlier view and the Board&#039;s circular clarifying that exports fall outside the computation of the prescribed turnover limit. On the stated facts, the goods were cleared under Form H, which was accepted as proof of export, and the department&#039;s attempt to treat those clearances as home consumption was found untenable at the prima facie stage. A prima facie case was therefore made out for waiver of predeposit and stay of recovery.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 12:28:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156461" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 606 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119464</link>
      <description>Export clearances are not to be included in the aggregate value of clearances for SSI exemption, as only clearances for home consumption are counted under the relevant notifications. The Tribunal relied on its earlier view and the Board&#039;s circular clarifying that exports fall outside the computation of the prescribed turnover limit. On the stated facts, the goods were cleared under Form H, which was accepted as proof of export, and the department&#039;s attempt to treat those clearances as home consumption was found untenable at the prima facie stage. A prima facie case was therefore made out for waiver of predeposit and stay of recovery.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119464</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>