https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119462 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner's order and permitting duty payment based on actual production. The Tribunal emphasized the relevance of the appellant's BIFR proceedings and cited legal precedents supporting the appellant's position. Despite previous directives, the adjudicating authority had disregarded the Tribunal's observations and the decision of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. The Tribunal found no merit in the impugned order and directed that duty be paid based on actual production, in line with the appellant's consistent request and legal precedents. en-us Thu, 02 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Jul 2012 12:21:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119462 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner's order and permitting duty payment based on actual production. The Tribunal emphasized the relevance of the appellant's BIFR proceedings and cited legal precedents supporting the appellant's position. Despite previous directives, the adjudicating authority had disregarded the Tribunal's observations and the decision of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. The Tribunal found no merit in the impugned order and directed that duty be paid based on actual production, in line with the appellant's consistent request and legal precedents. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 02 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119462