<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 551 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119421</link>
    <description>Imports made after suspension of the relevant REP licences were not valid, so the adverse finding on liability was sustained. On the facts, however, the monetary consequences were moderated: the fine and penalty were reduced, with credit for amounts already paid. The appeal therefore succeeded only to the limited extent of reducing the fine and penalty, while the conclusion that imports against suspended licences were impermissible was maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 10:31:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156418" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 551 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119421</link>
      <description>Imports made after suspension of the relevant REP licences were not valid, so the adverse finding on liability was sustained. On the facts, however, the monetary consequences were moderated: the fine and penalty were reduced, with credit for amounts already paid. The appeal therefore succeeded only to the limited extent of reducing the fine and penalty, while the conclusion that imports against suspended licences were impermissible was maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>