<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 351 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119416</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that rough diamonds do not qualify for deduction under section 80HHC. It also confirmed that depreciation on immovable properties must be deducted regardless of the claim. However, the treatment of interest income was remanded to the Assessing Officer for further review, resulting in the partial allowance of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 18:50:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156413" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 351 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119416</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that rough diamonds do not qualify for deduction under section 80HHC. It also confirmed that depreciation on immovable properties must be deducted regardless of the claim. However, the treatment of interest income was remanded to the Assessing Officer for further review, resulting in the partial allowance of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119416</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>