<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 313 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119407</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, granting exemptions under Section 10A for reimbursement from Exim Bank, corporate charges, charges for the use of workstations, and income from domestic software services. However, exemptions for interest on EEFC, rupee deposits, and ICDs were disallowed. The lease rent payment to Noida Authorities was considered revenue expenditure and allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 18:26:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156404" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 313 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119407</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, granting exemptions under Section 10A for reimbursement from Exim Bank, corporate charges, charges for the use of workstations, and income from domestic software services. However, exemptions for interest on EEFC, rupee deposits, and ICDs were disallowed. The lease rent payment to Noida Authorities was considered revenue expenditure and allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119407</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>