<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 312 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119403</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that payments under a business collaboration agreement were contractual, not falling under rent or commission categories. The assessee was obligated to deduct tax under section 194C only, absolving them from further liability under section 201(1). The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming the nature of payments and the appropriate tax deduction section.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 18:22:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 312 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119403</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that payments under a business collaboration agreement were contractual, not falling under rent or commission categories. The assessee was obligated to deduct tax under section 194C only, absolving them from further liability under section 201(1). The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming the nature of payments and the appropriate tax deduction section.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119403</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>