<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 303 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119382</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for statistical purposes and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal remanded certain matters to the Assessing Officer for re-adjudication and recomputation, specifically regarding the computation of deductions under section 33AC and section 80-IA/80-IB, ensuring compliance with statutory provisions and judicial precedents. The disallowance of the claim under section 35D was upheld, confirming that the operation of ships does not qualify as an industrial undertaking. The Tribunal also upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow commission and depreciation claims, dismissing the revenue&#039;s objections.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2024 17:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156379" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 303 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119382</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for statistical purposes and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal remanded certain matters to the Assessing Officer for re-adjudication and recomputation, specifically regarding the computation of deductions under section 33AC and section 80-IA/80-IB, ensuring compliance with statutory provisions and judicial precedents. The disallowance of the claim under section 35D was upheld, confirming that the operation of ships does not qualify as an industrial undertaking. The Tribunal also upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow commission and depreciation claims, dismissing the revenue&#039;s objections.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119382</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>