<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 298 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119365</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of exemption under section 10A of the Income-tax Act for a private limited company engaged in software development as the original promoters&#039; shareholding fell below 51%. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, emphasizing the necessity for promoters to hold shares with at least 51% voting power. Regarding the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for allegedly concealing income particulars, the Tribunal found the assessee had made a genuine disclosure and canceled the penalty, stating that the rejection of the exemption claim did not warrant a penalty if full and accurate disclosure was made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 16:47:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156362" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 298 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119365</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of exemption under section 10A of the Income-tax Act for a private limited company engaged in software development as the original promoters&#039; shareholding fell below 51%. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, emphasizing the necessity for promoters to hold shares with at least 51% voting power. Regarding the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for allegedly concealing income particulars, the Tribunal found the assessee had made a genuine disclosure and canceled the penalty, stating that the rejection of the exemption claim did not warrant a penalty if full and accurate disclosure was made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>