<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (7) TMI 438 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119358</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s Miscellaneous Application seeking rectification of the Tribunal&#039;s order, stating that the issues raised required elaborate reasoning and could not be addressed under section 254(2). The Tribunal emphasized that the CIT(A) should independently examine all relevant aspects of the case without being influenced by the observations made in the Order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 16:35:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156355" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (7) TMI 438 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119358</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s Miscellaneous Application seeking rectification of the Tribunal&#039;s order, stating that the issues raised required elaborate reasoning and could not be addressed under section 254(2). The Tribunal emphasized that the CIT(A) should independently examine all relevant aspects of the case without being influenced by the observations made in the Order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119358</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>