<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (7) TMI 437 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119357</link>
    <description>Expatriate employee remuneration is exempt under Article 15(2) of the India-Russia DTAA only if all three treaty conditions are met, including that the salary is not borne by the employer&#039;s permanent establishment in India. The Tribunal distinguished the India-France treaty language considered in Sedco Forex and held that tax payment in Russia was irrelevant to the Indian treaty test. Because the factual question whether the remuneration was borne by the Indian permanent establishment had not been properly verified, the matter was remanded to the CIT(A) for fresh determination after allowing the assessee an opportunity to substantiate its claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 16:31:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156354" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (7) TMI 437 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119357</link>
      <description>Expatriate employee remuneration is exempt under Article 15(2) of the India-Russia DTAA only if all three treaty conditions are met, including that the salary is not borne by the employer&#039;s permanent establishment in India. The Tribunal distinguished the India-France treaty language considered in Sedco Forex and held that tax payment in Russia was irrelevant to the Indian treaty test. Because the factual question whether the remuneration was borne by the Indian permanent establishment had not been properly verified, the matter was remanded to the CIT(A) for fresh determination after allowing the assessee an opportunity to substantiate its claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119357</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>