<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (12) TMI 498 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119355</link>
    <description>The tribunal granted the applicant&#039;s request to recall the final order due to the absence of their advocate on record, who was attending to a sick relative. The applicant agreed to bear costs of Rs. 10,000, leading to the recall of the order. The appeal was scheduled for a final hearing on 11th January, 2006, once the costs were settled. The application for recall was granted, and the matter was disposed of on 14-12-2005.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 16:24:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156352" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (12) TMI 498 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119355</link>
      <description>The tribunal granted the applicant&#039;s request to recall the final order due to the absence of their advocate on record, who was attending to a sick relative. The applicant agreed to bear costs of Rs. 10,000, leading to the recall of the order. The appeal was scheduled for a final hearing on 11th January, 2006, once the costs were settled. The application for recall was granted, and the matter was disposed of on 14-12-2005.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119355</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>