<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (12) TMI 494 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119351</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Appeal and upheld the Order-in-Original dropping the proceedings in a case involving manufacturers of aerated water accused of clearing excisable goods clandestinely without paying duty. The decision emphasized the importance of evidence, procedural compliance, and adherence to legal standards in excise duty cases, highlighting the need for thorough examination of facts and consistency with legal provisions for fair outcomes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 16:07:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156348" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (12) TMI 494 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119351</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Appeal and upheld the Order-in-Original dropping the proceedings in a case involving manufacturers of aerated water accused of clearing excisable goods clandestinely without paying duty. The decision emphasized the importance of evidence, procedural compliance, and adherence to legal standards in excise duty cases, highlighting the need for thorough examination of facts and consistency with legal provisions for fair outcomes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119351</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>