<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (11) TMI 427 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119343</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order, emphasizing the importance of adhering to legal procedures and respecting previous judgments to maintain judicial discipline. The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the rejection of the second refund claim was dismissed due to the failure to appeal an earlier decision, highlighting the necessity of following established legal principles and not circumventing previous rulings through subsequent appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 15:12:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156340" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (11) TMI 427 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119343</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order, emphasizing the importance of adhering to legal procedures and respecting previous judgments to maintain judicial discipline. The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the rejection of the second refund claim was dismissed due to the failure to appeal an earlier decision, highlighting the necessity of following established legal principles and not circumventing previous rulings through subsequent appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119343</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>